tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387936892975621860.post1207954754369379356..comments2024-03-21T07:55:18.139-06:00Comments on Do More With Software: Why Do High Sample Rates Sound Better?NCH Softwarehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10491182973108114208noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387936892975621860.post-91327976661655153462015-04-10T16:02:39.121-06:002015-04-10T16:02:39.121-06:00192khz sounds actually marginally worse than any o...192khz sounds actually marginally worse than any other sample rate. 96khz is even totally unnecessary and does not sound better than 44.1/48 whatsoever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3387936892975621860.post-43701049425873086932013-09-02T11:36:54.882-06:002013-09-02T11:36:54.882-06:00Thank you very for the detailed explanation.I coul...Thank you very for the detailed explanation.I could not be more agree with you. I listened carefully fron a known <br />hi res music online store 192khz 24 bit tracks from Chet Baker and The <br />Eagles burned directly to a DVD-Audio from FLACs and played on an known <br />uk’s hifi manufacturer DVD-Audio player and with transformer passive line stage, <br />class AB power amps heavywired to 4ohms/soft dome passive speakers the <br />difference with 16 bit 44 khz is breathtaking. Audiofilohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18328050245836612946noreply@blogger.com